Can God be proven to exist?  Yes, the Bible gives many accounts of miracles that were witnessed by many people.  Jesus, King of Heaven came to Earth in the flesh.    To be God in the flesh, Jesus must understand everything. Jesus understood that God created man with free will, thus when asked when the world was going to end he said, "I don't know."  Which is the correct answer based on free will.  The choices we make will determine our fate.  I am not predestined to accept or reject Jesus Christ.  If predestination were true, then Jesus would have given the exact date of his return.  Did Christ have the power to heal himself as he was going through the crucifixion?  If yes, then one could question whether he suffered.  When Christ said, "My God why have you forsaken me" he left no doubt that he truly suffered.

Further evidence of God can be proven, since the numbers never lie.  Math is at the foundation of all evidence.  Infinity is mathematically defined as the difference between zero and one. Nothing mathematically defined as zero divided by one (0 / 1). Absolute zero, scientifically defined as the absence of matter in a vacuum at zero Kelvin. No matter present and the absence of any movement is the fundamental definition of nothing.  Chemistry is the study of matter.  Why is matter important?  In a finite view of the universe, when matter was formed TIME began.  In science, anything an electron and smaller is classified as ENERGY.  Anything the size of a proton and larger is classified as MATTER.  Matter is considered to be something that has  measurable mass and takes up space.

Something mathematically defined as one divide by infinity (1/ any whole number).  Why define something mathematically with a ratio?  Something could also be defined as any whole number, but whole numbers stand alone.  Ratios are dependent on the numerator and denominator.  Ratios help us better understand the nature of something.  The entire periodic table of elements is composed of atoms made up of various ratios of protons, neutrons, and electrons.  Also, it is common knowledge that the proton, neutron and electron are products of quarks.  Who cares about a quark?  How does a proton added to an electron form a neutron?  Ratios of quarks make up the proton and electron.  Thus further study of quarks may answer this question.  Ratios concern breaking things down to the fundamental building blocks.  If we break substances down to there fundamental building blocks, we are left with two definitions.  Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space. And nothing.  God creates infinite and finite forms of matter using specific ratios of himself (Exodus3:1-15). 

Zero divided by one proves that something will divide into nothing zero times. Something (1) will go into nothing (0) a total of zero times, thus (0 / 1). What does this mean? When we talk about using numbers in ratios, for example 1/2 (only half of 2 meters will fit into 1meter). The one and the two are defined by dimensions. Something, which has dimension, will go into nothing, which is dimension less a total of zero times. Something that has dimension can not fit into nothing that has no dimension. This proves that something in its pure sense can not change into nothing in the absolute sense. Moreover, the one and zero are separate and distinct. The Universe consists of two things: God and nothing.

A calculator will read error when (1 / 0) is computed, since nothing cannot divide something. Therefore, how many times could nothing fit into something?  The answer is not infinite, since a true number for the answer does not exist.  Which means we could count infinitely and never reach the correct number.  An infinite amount of nothing is still zero.  Is the answer zero, like 0/1?  The answer can't be zero, because something is larger than nothing.  Furthermore, when 1/0 is calculated these are the reasons error is given as the answer.  Something must at all times be larger than nothing in order for 1/0 to be an error.   Density is a ratio of mass divided by volume.  Density has the units gram per milliliter which describes the dimension of something.  If a form of Energy has no mass, then it can be described as having zero density. Therefore, if energy has zero density it can be defined as nothing.  This ratio provides the best evidence that the big bang theory is wrong.

The Big Bang states that nothing (energy with no mass) created something (matter) out of emptiness.  Emptiness is the absence of space, time, energy, and matter.  In my opinion, it is not possible for emptiness to exist.  Emptiness is proven not to exist based on its own definition.  Thus, we could never scientifically test for evidence of emptiness to prove its philosophical role in the Big Bang.  Some believe that energy with no mass has a force.  However, there are more than ten different known quarks or small bundles of energy.  If these are just energy with no mass, how are they different?  Just because matter can change its density and make it more difficult for us to observe doesn't mean that its mass disappears.

The ratio (1/any whole number) is the reason why most scientists believe that nothing formed something.  Why?  As the number in the denominator increases the answer becomes smaller.  The question becomes when is so so so small so so so close to nothing?  Most scientists are estimators, look at the rules of significant digits.  Something has been estimated to equal zero after numerous divisions. This is what scientists mean when they say that nothing formed something.  However, mathematically this will not hold up.  This would mean that one times any number would be zero.

• Finite Universe  - zero and one are equal (matter can be infinitely divided) At the Planck distance and the Planck time all physics, as we know it today collapses. This is the reason we call the beginning of the big bang a singularity. You cannot apply ordinary reasoning there. Zero and one have no sense there.OK?J-P Burri <www.BigBang.org> This is evidence for a mathematical proof defining zero and one as equal.  Currently, math and physics before the Big Bang and after it do not relate.  Why should this spectacular random singularity be left out of current proofs, since it is such an important event?  It is not that it is a singularity, it is a random singularity.  This is the reason no end date to the Universe has ever been given.  This theory that nothing created everything  including the singularity that caused the big bang works well for atheists, since they believe that nothing is in control and some creationists agree with the idea that God created everything.  However, considering that it defines God as nothing they aren't promoting it in church. Nothing and Emptiness are not the same; according to this universe nothing has power over emptiness, since nothing created everything out of emptiness.    Emptiness is proven not to exist based on its own definition.  It is common knowledge that substances which are finite have predictable endings.  To even begin to publicly claim that the Universe was finite without being able to give a predictable ending shows a lack of self discipline and restraint.

• Infinite Universe - zero is not equal to one (there is a point where matter can't be divided)  In all other cases, Newton used the phenomenon of motion to explain the origin of various forces acting on bodies, but in the case of gravity, he was unable to experimentally identify the motion that produces the force of gravity. Moreover, he refused to even offer a hypothesis as to the cause of this force on grounds that to do so was contrary to sound science. He lamented that "philosophers have hitherto attempted the search of nature in vain" for the source of the gravitational force, as he was convinced "by many reasons" that there were "causes hitherto unknown" that were fundamental to all the "phenomena of nature". These fundamental phenomena are still under investigation and, though hypotheses abound, the definitive answer is yet to be found.  Gravity is a force that lacks activation, since it is constant and the only way that we know of to produce gravitons uniformly from a surface is to make that surface have a lot of mass!  Moreover, Newton's second law states that an object must have mass in order to produce a force.

Mass...  What is matter?  If I am describing an apple, then several adjectives can be used to describe the mass of the apple and the volume it occupies.  Matter is anything that has mass and takes up space.  As matter is divided it gets more and more difficult to describe.  A good example is light, the more we study the mass of light the less it behaves like its description as wave like.  Can the mass of a photon be described in terms that we understand?  To say that God is matter doesn't mean that its mass can be described (Exodus 19:1-20:21).  I have know idea what God looks like.

Characteristics...  We describe things based on characteristics.  If two things are the same, then they have the same characteristics.  This website describes nothing based on characteristics, thus atheists have every right to worship nothing as their god.  The question is can there be more than one God?  If there were more than one God, then there would be more than one thing that could neither be created nor destroyed.  Could God have no mass and be a creator that only moves?  This possibility leads me to some questions.  How would God distinguish between spirits in Heaven? How could a God with no mass be perfect, since he would lack a force of attraction and would be void of substance?  In Matthew 17:1-13, Mark 9:2-13, and Luke 9:28-36 descriptions of the transfiguration of Jesus are given.  These accounts are important, because they clearly show a visible distinction between Elijah and Moses (we see matter, because we are made of matter).  Both of whom are in Heaven right now and I guarantee you that they would not consider themselves Gods separate from the God of creation.  Remember Heaven is an eternal place.  Also, this view would counter the law of conservation of mass.  This law states that mass can neither be created nor destroyed.  Something that can neither be created nor destroyed is a God.  I believe that there is only one God.  If there were more than one God, then there would be evidence.  Living and nonliving substances are composed of matter.  The question is do you believe that Jesus was God in the flesh?  God is great; his perfect mass and perfect power of movement can't be described. 

In a finite Universe something can increase in quantity, since nothing is used to produce more of something.  This type of Universe is described to have begun many years ago.  In an infinite Universe the total amount of something remains constant.  When an atom is divided it no longer has the characteristics of the element.  There is a point where matter can't be divided and at this point something and nothing are distinctly defined.  In the infinite Universe, the term infinite is used to describe the difference between something and nothing.  Moreover, there is an infinite difference between zero and one.  God is infinite in the Universe in him time has no beginning nor ending.  Because God is infinite, he is the alpha and omega of all creation.  Therefore, the Universe is proven mathematically to be infinite.  The Universe had no beginning, since the Big Bang Theory is mathematically unproven.   The Big Bang explains God in the Universe as one.  The intentions of the Big Bang Theory were good, but its very idea indicates that God can be nothing.  Finally, according to the Big Bang Theory conditions that have not yet been scientifically proven were such that mass was created out of the movement.  And this is an educated conclusion?

[ Home ]

Send mail to info@kentuckyfamily.com with questions or comments about this web site. Established 2001
Copyright © 2012 KentuckyScience.com
Last modified: 1/01/2012